Le Journal
du Chihuahua
numéro 9, 9 septembre 2005

Voir les numéros précédents: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8


Sommaire


Editorial: neuf-neuf
Technology: Measuring Sweep Frequency On A Television
La chronique de Mister Oli: les arbutus de la côte ouest
The Chihuahua's Word: How To Distinguish Between True Mountaineers And Half-Hikers
La crónica del tejón: el museo de la Marmola se enriquece de una escultura de madera podrida



Editorial
Neuf-neuf

Tondu par ses créanciers, le Mouton, journal aux idées étroites comme la largeur de sa langue, semble avoir déposé son bilan dans l'oubli. Il serait mort de soif au fond de sa lavogne cérébralement à sec.

La semaine dernière, le marquis est parti en promenade sportive dans la montagne afin d'étudier et de répertorier les différentes espèces de montagnards. Il a choisi un sommet réputé difficile d'accès à cause l'une longue marche d'approche qui présentait l'avantage d'éliminer les apprentis de son étude, ceux qui ne vont en montagne que dans un but dissipatif, les ventilateurs du muscle et autres clowns à la mode constamment au régime, preneurs de poids obstinés, qui veulent démontrer leur volonté de réussir en ne faisant rien pour, parfois même en faisant le contraire.
Le marquis a ainsi découvert une lavogne d'altitude en granite, qu'il a nommé "lavogne aux moustiques". Vérification faite, cette lavogne d'altitude avait été initialement découverte en 1870, mais le marquis l'a brillamment redécouverte.

Il a aussi repéré le Mont Rainier caché dans les lointains bleuâtres. Ce n'était pas une découverte, mais le Mont Rainier étant sous les nuages plus de 380 jours par an, il est très difficile de le voir dégagé depuis une telle distance. D'ailleurs personne d'autre ne l'avait jamais vu comme l'a montré une enquête inopinée portant sur les rares individus présents ce jour là.

Enfin, notons que le numéro 9 paraît le 9 septembre, soit le neuf-neuf.



Technology
Measuring Sweep Frequency On A Television


This is an easy experiment for the few readers who still have a TV at home. We are not trying to push anyone to watch TV but this experiment is an occasion to profitabilize this utmostly useless instrument.

For those who ever attempted to take pictures on television, in order to make fun of the incredibly low level of the programs for example, the exposure time has a technological limit. The cathodic beam sweeps the screen to create an image. Once the image is displayed, the beam goes back to its original place and starts sweeping again to create a new image. The sweeping frequency is 60 Hz, which is to say a new image is displayed every 1/60 second (in Canada and the United States). To be sure the image on the screen has been fully displayed at least once, the exposure time has to be over 1/60 second.

The people or the objects on those images may look very ugly, but the purpose of this article is not to show TV programs better than they are.




Exposure time 1/60 s.
Some pictures present a dark horizontal stripe like here and some look normal. This shows that the beem sweeps the screen close to 60 Hz.

If the exposure time is shorter than 1/60 second, the beam does not have time to create a new image. The camera will see part of the old image and part of the new one on the same picture, the limit between the two being visible because the old disappearing image is darker than the new one.
 

Exposure time 1/250 s.
The lighter zones have been swept more recently than the darker ones.
Therefore it is necessary to expose more than 1/60 second to have a decent image.


Exposure time 1/8 s.
The image is blurred because the cars are moving.


But as the image is moving, it is necessary to have a short exposure time, and the shortest time acceptable is 1/60 s. The longer the exposure will be, the more blurred the pictures will look.



La chronique de Mister Oli
Les arbutus de la côte ouest

L'arbutus aime les sols secs ou bien drainés comme les côtes rocheuses. Il aime aussi la lumière et fuit le coeur des forêts. On le trouve dans les clairières et sur les côtes maritimes.


Arbutus menziesii a été décrit en 1792 par Archibald Menzies comme un arbousier d'Amérique. On le trouve au sud de la Colombie-Britannique à quelques kilomètres seulement de la côte maritime, sur l'Île de Vancouver et sur le continent.


Les arbutus sont exceptionnels dans les jardins, peut-être à cause de leur manque de majesté, plus sûrement parce que les jardiniers plantent rarement des arbres aborigènes. On trouve souvent des arbres aborigènes dans les jardins, mais les arbutus sont naturellement rares.

Les fruits de l'arbutus sont petits par rapport aux arbouses de son cousin européen.

Il est surtout utilisé en ébénisterie et en sculpture à cause de son bois dur et dense.





 



The Chihuahua's Word
How To Distinguish Between True Mountaineers And Half-Hikers
As numerous studies of marquis de Oliveras show, true mountaineers and half-hikers are often mixed up on the same mountains and are hard to tell apart because they usually look the same and go to the same places.

The Chihuahua, always very keen on unvailing the truth, decided to restart from scratch the studies of the marquis, and instead of studying individuals, he analysed locations.

The first difficulty the Chihuahua encountered was that unlike the notion of true mountaineer that was clear, the one of half-hiker was only a vague concept applied to all kinds of people. To observe half-hikers, the Chihuahua first had the idea of counting the number of shoes worn by the people climbing the Grouse Grind.

"I chose the Grouse Grind," the Chihuahua said, "because it is well known that true mountaineers never go there, which made my study easier." He was hoping that people would wear only one shoe, which would have explained the concept. However, everybody was wearing 2 shoes and the Chihuahua changed his observation protocol the next day.

The Chihuahua examined the type of shoes worn in pairs by half-hikers and noticed that they were usually wearing runners, let us say slippers in terms of mountain technology. "I was about to rename half-hikers mountainteers-in-slippers when I realized that the number of people climbing was a lot greater than the number of people going down." The Chihuahua immediately understood that half-hikers were only hiking half of the path, usually the way up, and were coming down by other means of transportation that he was not interested in.
After numerous observations, the concept was extended because the same type of hikers were also found in the back mountains, Grouse, Dam, Goat, and even Crown, usually in the afternoon. The Chihuahua merged the two concepts of mountaineer-in-slippers and half-hikers in a famous article called Afternoon-Hikers or The Plague Of The Fly Swarm. This article extensively explains that afternoon-hikers, so-called although they can be observed early in the morning, are people who do not want to spend time in the mountain. Most of them stay one hour or less, exceptionally up to 4 hours for those who reach Crown Mountain and that are found in the afternoon.

The article became famous for merging the ideas of half-day and half-way into the concept of half-hiker.

True mountaineers, however, do not do things half-way. They go up and down on foot, they walk in the morning and in the afternoon, spend more than 4 hours in the mountain, commonly 8 to 10 hours, sometimes more.

Half-hikers and true-mountaineers often use the same equipment, hiking boots, trek poles, backpacks. It is not easy to tell them apart by looking at their equipment, unless they fall into the category of hiker-in-slippers or are spotted on the Grouse Grind. Otherwise it is necessary to analyse how much time they spend hiking and if they walk all the way or take a motorized vehicle.

To present the results of his study, the Chihuahua published another article, Half-Hikers Being Doubled or the Self-Conciousness of a Disaster, about half-hikers that were doubling the time they
were spending in the mountain. They were believing they had become true mountaineers, but the article shows that doubling a half-hiker only makes a plain hiker. The difference between a plain hiker and a true mountaineer is that the plain hiker only hikes like two half-hikers whereas for the true mountaineer, hiking is secondary, the main issue being to explore the mountain, to observe it, to record the faintest smell of every rock, to learn from each step and to improve this knowledge like true gardeners watch their plants growing when other people just mow their lawn. Half and full-hikers are trying to spend energy whereas true mountaineers strive to save it.

Practically, half-hikers, single or double, only see their feet and the bum of the person in front of them. True mountaineers do not see the person in front of them because it is too far and hidden by the trees, but they can spot grouses, ravens, invisible remote summits or unsual marine mammals like seals and otters, smell bears eating berries and hear the breath of mosquitoes walking on their clothes. And more important than anything, they can feel their feet walking alone without moving their legs, they can hear clouds roaring in silence and eat their homemade pizza without having to support the fat smell of the neighbour at the next table and without feeling the bad taste of the cheap cheese drowning the tasteless crust as pictured on the pizza-coupon.

Foxes get rid of their fleas by slowly diving into the water, holding in their mouth a tuft of grass where the fleas can go before foxes let it go. In the same way, the mountain gets rid of its parasites by letting them concentrate onto the Grouse Grind. Although the process is not perfect, half-hikers tend to clutter more and more on this famous one-way path as the Chihuahua shows in a book yet to be published: The Fly Paper Of The North Shore.



La crónica del tejón
El museo de la Marmola se enriquece de una escultura de madera podrida

El marqués de Oliveras que siempre está pescando trozos de madera podrida con su barca mojaculos, descubrió una pieza unica ya esculpido, flotando en el Guadalquivir.

La escultura estaba tan mojada que parecía blanda y el marqués primero creía que el trozo era un pulpo pues vió la cara que estaba sacando la lengua.

La escultura descubierta por el marqués
flotando en el Guadalquivir.

Como de costumbre, dio la escultura al museo de la Marmola, cuyo director hizo instalar en el pabellon reservedo a las obras dadas por el marqués.
La cara parece burlarse del visitor y queda una enigma para los especialistas. La Licenciada Gargamela Iturritxe, la abogada que siempre dice que las obras propuestas por el marqués son falsas sin nunca escuchar las pruebas, dijo que la escultura era tan falsa que ni siquiera existía. El marqués, exasperado por la mala voluntad de Gargamela Iturritxe, escribió el mismo al dorso de la cara de madera: "La sola verdadera Gargamela. Todas las otras son falsas."


Las dos barcas del marqués:
el Santiago Matamoros y la Gloria de Neptuno


Mientras tanto, la escultura parece burlarse de la abogada.